How to Overcome Data Handover Challenges in Global Facilities
In our previous blog, Where do Project Managers Fit in Asset Lifecycle Information Management?, we discuss how in asset lifecycle information management, the number of changes and documents to track is extensive. We’re digging further into the challenges that arise from the handover process between engineering firms and owner-operators.
When different departments are involved within a project, owner-operators often struggle to obtain operations and maintenance information on various assets in a usable form, leading to expensive project delays, penalties, and industrial accidents. At the root of this problem is that larger, multi-national engineering, procurement, and construction firms are the ones who determine how information is provided, and smaller firms do not have the resources or expertise to provide the data in that manner. This disparity leaves the owner-operator with the ongoing challenge of getting the information about their newly commissioned facility into some sort of order, so they can operate in a safe, compliant, and efficient manner.
On average, an owner-operator unexpectedly spends 2-4% of the project cost to correct and reproduce missing operations and maintenance information manually1. Even slightly reducing that percentage would represent a significant reduction of this unaccounted-for cost. If the correct operations and maintenance information is provided from the beginning, the safety of operations, which is an absolute priority for all asset-heavy companies is considered an additional benefit.
How to Begin
Owner-operators need to clearly define what they want from their suppliers in terms of data. For example, expectations about formatting data or classifying information should be clear from the beginning.
The handover process is never easy and can be costly. When expectations about specific formatting and classifications are involved, contractors justify an additional (large) fee to these meet demands because it’s considered “custom.” If these contractors have standards that work for most customers, it makes sense to charge more to do “extra work.”
This approach causes most purchasing departments to settle for lower expectations in order to bring down the costs. Therefore, the cycle of pain continues.
How to Improve
Solving the expectations problem means all parties working together towards a strategy that benefits not just the long-suffering operations and maintenance department. If everyone involved (owner-operators, contractors, engineers, etc.) agrees on a common standard to use when defining and exchanging asset information, then everyone involved can see the benefits.
Adding contextual information about the data is a great starting point. By providing context, the receiver is aligned to understand what they have been given and does not need to waste time rebuilding what has already been stated.
If the contextual information is standardized across industries, then stakeholders can build systems and processes that reduce risks and costs through improvements to data quality, automation and repeatable use of the systems and methods. For example, the Capital Facilities Information Handover Standard (CFIHOS) is an organization within the oil and gas industry dedicated to providing common solutions for asset information.
For over 30 years, Accruent has supported the process manufacturing industry by standardizing and improving the asset information handling process. Using accurate, interoperable data, our software solution, Meridian Portal, provides opportunities for our customers to transform project delivery.
The adoption of industry standards throughout the supply chain can benefit everyone. The handover of information does not have to be a costly or painful process, and with the right solution and expectations laid out – can be overcome.
Find out more about how Accruent can help project managers with Asset Lifecycle Information Management or get in touch with us today.
1Bever, Ken. “Problems with Information Handover.” MIMOSA, 20 July 2011